Your Strategic Plan in 7 Days

Posted by on March 17, 2010

Is it possible to create a corporate strategic plan in a week?  The answer depends from where you are starting.  Are you starting from the most current plan?  What results are wanted out of the process this time around?  What are the definitions you want to attach to “strategic plan”, and to “done”? 

In a recent online discussion with a colleague, this topic was debated.  I want to give him credit for the schedule and plan disclosed below without disclosing his name and information.  My colleague’s assertion was that a good strategic plan can be completed within a week’s time, using the following schedule:

  • First Day: The executive team reviews a binder containing all pertinent information from each functional area of the business
  • Second Day:  Used for reading and thinking
  • Third Day: Used for discussion of ideas
  • Fourth Day:  Another day for reading and thinking
  • Fifth Day: Off-site workshop to discuss recommendations again and reflect on budget implications
  • Sixth Day: Used to finalize and adopt the plan, inclusive of defining implementation timelines and budgets
  • Seventh Day:  A day of rest

The truth is, it is possible to accomplish the creation of the enterprise strategic plan in seven days.  The keystone is that the organization must have a mature and effective planning process already in place. 

Just compiling the data to go into the “magic binder” referenced above in the plan for the First Day can be a daunting task for a large multi-national company.  Setting that aside, even if the plan is created in a week’s time, is the job really done?  Has everything that needs to be done to support the strategy roll-out been addressed?

Again, what is the definition of “done”? 

The approach as outlined above misses many critical points that planning should encompass, which prompted this response:  Order now and get a free 2-minute egg timer!


Strategy Cannot Be Ordered-up Like a Set Of Ginsu Knives

Creating strategy requires intimate business knowledge, collected systematically through a process that pulls from all parts of the organization.  What my colleague described doesn’t sound like the finished product of comprehensive strategic planning, nor does this approach address any operational input or detailed planning to ensure that the plan can be implemented once it gets handed off by the executive team.  To execute on the plan, it must be communicated and understood.  The plan also must have been defined using realistic input so that it really can really be executed within the timeframes they’d decided.

Operations / Tactical Plans

Defining enterprise strategy is not the same as creating an enterprise (e.g. corporate) strategic plan.  A strategy defines the direction, but a holistic plan defines goals (key outcomes) that support the strategy and must address the tactics of execution within operations that will accomplish the goals.  Comprehensive strategic and operational plans that are capable of accomplishing the goals of the enterprise strategy take more time to create than just one week.  Such planning is dependent upon integrated initiative management that sorts out resources needed, cost to implement, timeframes to deliver, who will do what and when they will do it.  Accountability for plan execution must be engineered into the tactics so that performance can be measured and managed.

Communication and Change Management

What gets included in with the scope of strategic planning?  What is and what isn’t included in the scope of planning drive the time frame to develop the plan.  Time invested in up-front planning saves far more time on the back-end when companies go to execute their strategy.  Communication and change management are examples of two areas where companies shave off time in the planning process to the detriment of the outcome.  These essential components are too often overlooked, even though they are important factors in strategic planning and directly affect the successful results of execution. 

Why is this?  I believe it is attributed to the failure to consider the organization’s culture and the organization’s framework for organizing and managing work initiatives related to the strategic plan’s goals.  Let’s face it, strategy goes hand-in-hand with business execution. 

Since one without the other spells trouble, why not consider the layers of the organization that actually will be doing this work?  Employees are entitled to know the vision of their organization, and likewise, need to have an understanding of the strategy.  Creating the understanding in and of itself requires effort, and of course...planning.  This becomes even more critical when they are directly impacted by the strategy, either through process changes or through integration with newly acquired units. 

Each of the following must be explicitly defined and understand as part of the planning process:  


  • What levels of the organization are directly impacted?
  • What roles at those levels are directly affected?
  • When and how must the employees who will be impacted by change be notified?
  • What is the best way to make the information actionable to them?

This is where change management and good communication help alleviate the fear, uncertainty and doubt that develops in the minds of good and capable employees who are uninformed as to the strategy and operational tactics planned by the organization.  Getting people on board with the program and educating them about how they will be asked to participate, assist and be held accountable to the strategy is vital and takes more than a week to accomplish.  Just for management to define how enterprise goal attainment will affect operations via tactical plan execution takes (repeat after me)...time.  Each role is relative to the big picture:

  • changes to job responsibilities
  • measurements of the plan
  • rewards / consequences as a result of execution

All must be considered.  The culture or cultures of the organization will also drive the formula for the communication plan and the change management approach.

Ongoing Execution

Governance is a day-by-day activity that is arguably not part of the strategic planning process itself, but is the essential component of the very definition of being able to consider the job “done”.  In my opinion, it should be considered part of the planning process, not only because governance is used to manage and track execution but also the success of strategy itself.

So How Long Should Strategic Planning Take?

As a leader in your organization, the answer is up to you.  You can adjust the definitions to meet your expectations requirements and desired key outcomes.  Executives must define the vision so that the planning process can be executed to meet that definition of success.  This is true of of all aspects of execution planning as well.  All roads lead back to the executive leadership’s ability to set up a planning approach that enables successful outcomes from the effort.  Yes, the answer to how long it takes to complete strategic planning is dependent on the scope of the process, the expectations of the outcomes and the discipline leaders are willing to put into the approach.  The good news is, at least you know ahead of time what to expect as well as what you cannot expect from the process.

Like most things in life, you get out of it what you put into it.


 

For permission to use or reprint any portions of this copyrighted article, contact Method Frameworks at articles@methodframeworks.com.

About the Author:

Joe Evans is the President and CEO of Method Frameworks.  Joe is a published author, frequent speaker and recognized expert in corporate strategic planning. To contact Method Frameworks about scheduling Mr. Evans about an upcoming speaking engagement, visit www.methodframeworks.com/business-speaker or email requests to media_relations@methodframeworks.com.


    

Do not miss these two important downloads for executives and business strategy professionals.

 

Strategy Execution

Guide to Strategic Planning

Our guide to successful strategic planning, called "Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Execution", is a 13 page complimentary resource to help your organization initiate and manage the corporate strategic planning discipline.

Download Now

Receive our complimentary guide to successful strategic planning now. Click on the link below and you will receive instant access to "Bridging the Gap Between Strategy and Execution" in PDF format. Download now.

Guide to Operational Planning

Our guide to successful operational planning, called "Strategy Implementation Essentials", is an 18 page complimentary resource to help your organization succeed in operational planning and strategy execution.

Download Now

Receive our complimentary guide to successful operational planning now. Click on the link below and you will receive instant access to "Strategy Implementation Essentials" in PDF format. Download now.


 

LinkedIn Logo  Join the Strategic Planning Xchange group. 

Learn More

Method Frameworks is a leading business strategy and management consulting company, based in the Dallas / Fort Worth area and serving clients nationally and internationally.

Discover our capabilities and learn why Method Frameworks is the strategic planning partner chosen by Fortune-500 companies and small businesses alike. Let us show you how to realize 140%+ ROI on your strategic planning efforts through our unique Plan4SM process that brings together strategy and execution into a powerful plan.   Plan4 is our proprietary business planning process that involves an integrated set of actions designed to help companies gain sustainable advantage. Download our brochure to learn more about Method Frameworks and our services or download our Plan4 Planning Process Overview.

You can contact Method Frameworks at 877-317-5264 (877-31PLAN4) or follow this link to request a meeting with a planning consultant. Check our articles and blog often at www.methodframeworks.com to get many more planning tips and information about our Plan4 process.

Bookmark and Share

Strategic Focus

Thanks to "Method Frameworks" for clearly describing the complexities of building a strong and sustainable master plan of ones world or company in just 7 days - only a few if any have actually succeeded? Overall I agree with "Method Framework"'s observations, suggestions and comments. In short I find that: The Strategy must be clear as crystal and clearly describe how the company creates a unique position in relation to its customers and against its competitors. The organisation must fit like a glove with the strategy and a winning team of employees with the right competencies must be set. Operations must show positive figures and the key figures must point forward to show future potential of the business If you are a BtB owner you may find interest in taking a look at my blog on strategy: www.strategyonline.blogspot.com Regards Peter Sørensen B-E-E Consulting

Post new comment